Fider Alternative: Hosted Feedback Without the Ops Work
Fider is free if you self-host it. Here's what that actually costs in setup and maintenance, and how a hosted free tier like Feevox compares.
Fider is open source, and self-hosting it is genuinely free — the software costs nothing, you run a Docker image plus PostgreSQL, and it's lightweight enough to run on modest hardware. For teams that want full control of their data and don't mind operating infrastructure, that's a real option. People start looking for a Fider alternative when "free" software turns into real work: patching, backups, uptime, and — since Fider moved to an open-core model — some features (like content moderation and SEO indexing) are now behind its paid hosted tiers, not available even to self-hosters. Hosted Fider plans run roughly $29/month (Starter) to $99/month (Professional). (Confirm current details on fider.io and the Fider GitHub repo.)
TL;DR
Fider is a solid choice if you specifically want to self-host and own your infrastructure. If you just want a feedback board without becoming its sysadmin, a hosted free tier gets you there faster — and with more out of the box.
Side by side
| What you're deciding on | Fider | Feevox |
|---|---|---|
| Self-hosted, free | Yes — Docker + PostgreSQL, you run it | Not offered — hosted only |
| Hosted plan | $29-99/mo | Free — 1 board, up to 100 ideas, no card |
| Public roadmap view | Not included | Yes |
| Changelog | Not included | Yes, linked to shipped ideas |
| Content moderation | Paid cloud tier only | Included on every plan |
| SEO indexing of board | Paid cloud tier only | Included on every plan |
| Integrations | Webhooks to Slack, Discord, Teams | ClickUp two-way sync, webhooks |
| Ops burden | You own uptime, backups, upgrades | None — fully managed |
Where the real difference is
If data ownership and self-hosting are non-negotiable for you — some teams have real reasons for that — Fider's open-source model is the honest answer, and Feevox doesn't compete there; we're hosted only.
For everyone else, the comparison is less about price and more about what you get. Fider's self-hosted tier notably lacks a public roadmap view and changelog — the two things that turn a raw idea list into something that closes the loop with customers. You'd need the paid hosted tier for moderation and search indexing too. Feevox includes all of that — roadmap, changelog, moderation, indexing — on the free plan, with nothing to deploy or patch.
The real cost of "free" self-hosted software is time: setting up Docker and Postgres, keeping the instance patched, handling your own backups and uptime. That's a fair trade if infrastructure is your team's comfort zone. If it isn't, it's hidden cost dressed up as a free tier.
Who should switch
If you want a working feedback board today, without owning a server, or you specifically want the roadmap/changelog features Fider doesn't include in self-hosted mode, Feevox gets you there in minutes with nothing to maintain.
If you need to keep feedback data entirely in-house for compliance or policy reasons, Fider's self-hosted route remains the more honest fit — that's not a gap Feevox is trying to close.
Related comparisons
Also worth a look: Canny, FeatureOS, Nolt, Frill, Featurebase, Upvoty, and Sleekplan — or see the full roundup of feedback tools.
Try before you commit
See what a fully managed board looks like — free, no server required.
Create a free board and see how it fits.
Ready to collect feedback?
Spin up a feedback board and public roadmap in under 2 minutes. Free, no credit card.
Get Started Free