Skip to main content
All posts
Fider AlternativeComparison

Fider Alternative: Hosted Feedback Without the Ops Work

Fider is free if you self-host it. Here's what that actually costs in setup and maintenance, and how a hosted free tier like Feevox compares.

The Feevox TeamSeptember 20, 20266 min read

Fider is open source, and self-hosting it is genuinely free — the software costs nothing, you run a Docker image plus PostgreSQL, and it's lightweight enough to run on modest hardware. For teams that want full control of their data and don't mind operating infrastructure, that's a real option. People start looking for a Fider alternative when "free" software turns into real work: patching, backups, uptime, and — since Fider moved to an open-core model — some features (like content moderation and SEO indexing) are now behind its paid hosted tiers, not available even to self-hosters. Hosted Fider plans run roughly $29/month (Starter) to $99/month (Professional). (Confirm current details on fider.io and the Fider GitHub repo.)

TL;DR

Fider is a solid choice if you specifically want to self-host and own your infrastructure. If you just want a feedback board without becoming its sysadmin, a hosted free tier gets you there faster — and with more out of the box.

Side by side

What you're deciding onFiderFeevox
Self-hosted, freeYes — Docker + PostgreSQL, you run itNot offered — hosted only
Hosted plan$29-99/moFree — 1 board, up to 100 ideas, no card
Public roadmap viewNot includedYes
ChangelogNot includedYes, linked to shipped ideas
Content moderationPaid cloud tier onlyIncluded on every plan
SEO indexing of boardPaid cloud tier onlyIncluded on every plan
IntegrationsWebhooks to Slack, Discord, TeamsClickUp two-way sync, webhooks
Ops burdenYou own uptime, backups, upgradesNone — fully managed

Where the real difference is

If data ownership and self-hosting are non-negotiable for you — some teams have real reasons for that — Fider's open-source model is the honest answer, and Feevox doesn't compete there; we're hosted only.

For everyone else, the comparison is less about price and more about what you get. Fider's self-hosted tier notably lacks a public roadmap view and changelog — the two things that turn a raw idea list into something that closes the loop with customers. You'd need the paid hosted tier for moderation and search indexing too. Feevox includes all of that — roadmap, changelog, moderation, indexing — on the free plan, with nothing to deploy or patch.

The real cost of "free" self-hosted software is time: setting up Docker and Postgres, keeping the instance patched, handling your own backups and uptime. That's a fair trade if infrastructure is your team's comfort zone. If it isn't, it's hidden cost dressed up as a free tier.

Who should switch

If you want a working feedback board today, without owning a server, or you specifically want the roadmap/changelog features Fider doesn't include in self-hosted mode, Feevox gets you there in minutes with nothing to maintain.

If you need to keep feedback data entirely in-house for compliance or policy reasons, Fider's self-hosted route remains the more honest fit — that's not a gap Feevox is trying to close.

Also worth a look: Canny, FeatureOS, Nolt, Frill, Featurebase, Upvoty, and Sleekplan — or see the full roundup of feedback tools.

Try before you commit

See what a fully managed board looks like — free, no server required.

Create a free board and see how it fits.

Ready to collect feedback?

Spin up a feedback board and public roadmap in under 2 minutes. Free, no credit card.

Get Started Free